Re: Czech Republic ratifies the minority convention (and a comment)
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 98 12:50:02 -0500
From: MINELRES moderator <minelres@mailbox.riga.lv>
Message-Id: <199801311046.MAA04423@mailbox.riga.lv>
To: "minelres-l@riga.lv" <minelres-l@riga.lv>
Subject: Re: Czech Republic ratifies the minority convention (and a comment)
From: MINELRES moderator <minelres@mailbox.riga.lv>
Original sender: Fernand De Varennes <Fernand.DeVarennes@eurac.edu>
Re: Czech Republic ratifies the minority convention (and a comment)
Could someone explain to me the basis for the following comment on the
Framework Convention on National Minorities which was contained in a recent
posting at MINELRES:
> Given that this convention has been a source of contention
> among the Council's member-states, a general definition of the term
> "minority" has not been adopted. Each state can decide for itself
> which groups it chooses to recognise as a minority.
Minority was not precisely defined for the application of Article 26 of the
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, but in a number of
decisions and comments the United Nations Human Rights Committee has made it
relatively clear that defining a minority under the Covenant is not left to
the discretion of the government: it is an objective definition which rests
on whether or not a linguistic, religious or ethnic group represents less
than 50% of the population of a State.
Why and how is the Framework Convention different?
Merci!
Dr Fernand de Varennes
--
==========================================================================
MINELRES - a forum for discussion on minorities in Central&Eastern Europe
Submissions: minelres-l@riga.lv
Subscription/inquiries: minelres@mailbox.riga.lv
List archive: http://www.riga.lv/minelres/archive.htm
==========================================================================